MAKE A MEME View Large Image The elegant ladies in this studio portrait are Miss Eileen Hanrahan (standing) and her sister Mrs Margaret Rawley, who lived at No. 2, The Mall in Waterford City. Thanks to mogey and her work with the census online, we now know that Mrs ...
View Original:January_28,_1902.jpg (1890x2445)
Download: Original    Medium    Small Thumb
Courtesy of:www.flickr.com More Like This
Keywords: miss hanrahan misshanrahan mrs rowley mrsrowley hanrahan rowley women portrait choker pearls fan rings lace brooch cushions palms tuesday 28 january 1902 1900s a.h. poole ahpoole arthur henri poole arthurhenripoole poole collection poolecollection glass negative glassnegative the mall themall ireland munster waterford national library of ireland nationallibraryofireland explore people blackandwhite monochrome wedding gown black and white The elegant ladies in this studio portrait are Miss Eileen Hanrahan (standing) and her sister Mrs Margaret Rawley, who lived at No. 2, The Mall in Waterford City. Thanks to mogey and her work with the census online, we now know that Mrs Rowley, as we thought she was, was actually Mrs Rawley. At the time this photo was taken, Margaret Rawley was a widow and would have been aged around 32. Her unmarried sister, Eileen, who was a telegraph clerk, would have been around 25. Somewhere along the line, Mrs Rawley either made a mistake in her census form filling, or was a little imaginative with her age. She recorded herself as 31 in the 1901 census, but as aged 37 in the 1911 census... Date: Tuesday, 28 January 1902 NLI Ref.: P_WP_1282 The elegant ladies in this studio portrait are Miss Eileen Hanrahan (standing) and her sister Mrs Margaret Rawley, who lived at No. 2, The Mall in Waterford City. Thanks to mogey and her work with the census online, we now know that Mrs Rowley, as we thought she was, was actually Mrs Rawley. At the time this photo was taken, Margaret Rawley was a widow and would have been aged around 32. Her unmarried sister, Eileen, who was a telegraph clerk, would have been around 25. Somewhere along the line, Mrs Rawley either made a mistake in her census form filling, or was a little imaginative with her age. She recorded herself as 31 in the 1901 census, but as aged 37 in the 1911 census... Date: Tuesday, 28 January 1902 NLI Ref.: P_WP_1282
Terms of Use   Search of the Day